Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks to some help from Marcus and Axel, I think I'm finally getting 
> close to wringing some session info out of my cdrom drive. :-) I also 
> have a nearly working ISO9660 fs module, and finishing it should be 
> fairly straightforward. I'll post more news when I have some.

Very nice!
We should also have priorities for the file system modules (i.e. a UDF 
file system should always get the disk, not the ISO-9660 file system, 
if possible).
Also, how does the system deal with multi-session CDs (and the like)=3F 
We might also want to have write support built-in, disks that span over 
several volumes, etc.
At least we should think about every possible extension we might want 
to add to that piece of code.

> It appears the the module emulator is not working quite right in 
> instances where you have two (and probably more) modules of the same 
> type. When testing the iso9660 fs module (alongside the bfs module), 
> both modules are init'd and uninit'd initially when the list is 
> created, but only the first one (bfs, in this case) is returned by 
> read=5Fnext=5Fmodule=5Fname(), which then returns an error the second time 
> it's called. I'll look into it more if I get sessions working.

Very nice, too :-)

Adios...
   Axel.