Re: Volume Sets

Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, it sounds to me like we ought to present only the last iso9660
> > and/or UDF volume on a multi-session CD by default, but make any
> > others available (since I think that's a very handy feature to 
> > have).
> >  I don't know that this is anything we need to offer in the Disk
> > Device API though; Tracker could just figure things out on a device
> > by device basis. Also, in the case of other filesystems (like the 
> > R5
> > CD with a BFS image), I think we should just present them all like 
> > is
> > currently done.
> I don't like the idea of the Tracker needing to undertake special
> examination of devices. How about the (my :-) idea to reflect those
> relationships of partitions in the Disk Device API by methods like
> BPartition *BPartition::Supercedes()/IsSupercededBy()?

I would like that more, but we'll see how easy that will be to 
implement.

Adios...
   Axel.