Re: Amiga RDB
"Axel Dörfler" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbeos.storage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4915455341-BeMail@nichtsnutz> |
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Axel Dörfler wrote: [driver_settings enhancements] > > Hm... I could try to do that tomorrow, but if I don't find the > > time, > > feel free to do it. > I guess, I'll reach the point, where I need it (well, `need' is not > exactly correct, since it would be possible to leave the parameter > stuff > out for scanning, but it would be nice to have it, for that part > could be > completed then) Friday or on the weekend at the latest. So, if you > haven't > done it till then, I'll just go ahead and implement it. Fair enough - but I'll try to be faster than you this one time :-) > > But it should probably be moved from kernel/core to kernel/libroot/ > > os/ > > right? > It will be needed in both kernel- and userland, and unless I'm > mistaken, > the kernel is not supposed to access libroot, is it? So, it has to be > compiled and linked into both, and, I think, it doesn't make much > difference where the sources are located, then. For the build yes, but for the cleanliness of the tree, I would rather have it in libroot. The kernel doesn't link against the whole libroot, but statically against parts of it. I wanted place every Posix like calls under libroot/posix usable by both, and the OS specific stuff in libroot/os - also usable by both parties. In fact, many files are already used in this way. > > Maybe we want to wait with that move until we have our own > > repository, > > though, to not lose any changes information. > Have I missed something? Have the plans to move to an own server > become > more concrete? I thought, it was agreed on leaving the repository at > SF > for the time being, perhaps do mirror it at our site, and decide > later on > whether or not to move it. I thought we would do that some day. But maybe it's still far away in the future. > However, as SF provides a CVS tarball, we wouldn't lose any version > info, > if we would move, anyway. True - even if it's in the attic it's still there :-) Maybe I will just move it then before doing any changes. We might want to recompile it with different capabilities though at a later time. Adios... Axel.