Re: Amiga RDB

"Axel Dörfler" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbeos.storage
Message-ID <4915455341-BeMail@nichtsnutz>
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Axel Dörfler wrote:
[driver_settings enhancements]
> > Hm... I could try to do that tomorrow, but if I don't find the 
> > time,
> > feel free to do it.
> I guess, I'll reach the point, where I need it (well, `need' is not
> exactly correct, since it would be possible to leave the parameter 
> stuff
> out for scanning, but it would be nice to have it, for that part 
> could be
> completed then) Friday or on the weekend at the latest. So, if you 
> haven't
> done it till then, I'll just go ahead and implement it.

Fair enough - but I'll try to be faster than you this one time :-)

> > But it should probably be moved from kernel/core to kernel/libroot/
> > os/
> > right?
> It will be needed in both kernel- and userland, and unless I'm 
> mistaken,
> the kernel is not supposed to access libroot, is it? So, it has to be
> compiled and linked into both, and, I think, it doesn't make much
> difference where the sources are located, then.

For the build yes, but for the cleanliness of the tree, I would rather 
have it in libroot. The kernel doesn't link against the whole libroot, 
but statically against parts of it.
I wanted place every Posix like calls under libroot/posix usable by 
both, and the OS specific stuff in libroot/os - also usable by both 
parties.
In fact, many files are already used in this way.

> > Maybe we want to wait with that move until we have our own 
> > repository,
> > though, to not lose any changes information.
> Have I missed something? Have the plans to move to an own server 
> become
> more concrete? I thought, it was agreed on leaving the repository at 
> SF
> for the time being, perhaps do mirror it at our site, and decide 
> later on
> whether or not to move it.

I thought we would do that some day. But maybe it's still far away in 
the future.

> However, as SF provides a CVS tarball, we wouldn't lose any version 
> info,
> if we would move, anyway.

True - even if it's in the attic it's still there :-)
Maybe I will just move it then before doing any changes. We might want 
to recompile it with different capabilities though at a later time.

Adios...
   Axel.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.