Re: Module location

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2003-06-11 at 13:48:13 [-0700], Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > modules themselves, and those will probably stay in `file_systems'
> > (even if turned from add-ons into modules), we perhaps want the 
> > modules for partitioning systems in `partitioning_systems'.
> Sounds fine to me. `ps' would be okay by me, too, if `fs' is used.

The path is "file_systems" - and I really don't like cryptic 
abbreviations like "ps" ("fs" could be an exception since it is very 
common), but it's okay to express yourself ;-P

Adios...
   Axel.