Re: Module location

On 2003-06-11 at 18:50:14 [-0700], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 2003-06-11 at 13:48:13 [-0700], Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > > modules themselves, and those will probably stay in `file_systems'
> > > (even if turned from add-ons into modules), we perhaps want the
> > > modules for partitioning systems in `partitioning_systems'.
> > Sounds fine to me. `ps' would be okay by me, too, if `fs' is used.
> 
> The path is "file_systems" - and I really don't like cryptic
> abbreviations like "ps" ("fs" could be an exception since it is very
> common), but it's okay to express yourself ;-P

I just didn't want to end up with:

(path)/fs
(path)/partitioning_systems

that's all. :-P :-)

-Tyler