Re: My Usual Confusion

Tyler Dauwalder <tyler-cyCl/[email protected]> wrote:
> > PS: How about a BPartition::GetDiskSystem(BDiskSystem*)? Then
> > BPartition::ContentType() wouldn't even need to have any strong
> > relationship with the disk system's (pretty) name.
> Having seen the way types would need to laid down using the 
> Type()/ContentType() system, I'd actually much rather just go back to 
> using Type() only (semantically like our current ContentType()) than 
> do 
> this. Though a GetDiskSystem() call could still be useful.
> 
> What do you think? :-)

What about leaving ContentType() to what it is now and change Type() so 
that you can use the partition type in a switch case statement like:

switch (partition->Type()) {
	case BPartition::B_FILE_SYSTEM_TYPE:
		...
		break;
	case BPartition::B_PARTITION_SYSTEM_TYPE:
		...
		break;
}

?
BTW is there any way to get to a partition without a disk system object 
at all? If so, GetDiskSystem() would not only be useful, I think.

Adios...
   Axel.