Re: [Open-beos-cvs]CVS: current/src/tests/add-ons/kernel/disk_scanner DiskScannerTest.cpp,1.7,1.8

Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbeos.storage
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote:

> Ingo Weinhold <bonefish-CFLBMwTPW48UNGrzBIF7/[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Added a comment about from where to start that application.
> > > If get=5Fnth=5Fpartition/session=5Finfo() returns with anything else than
> > > a
> > > B=5FENTRY=5FNOT=5FFOUND, an error message is printed out.
> > > The device name can now be specified on the command line, added
> > > shortcuts
> > > to identify a particular device, i.e. "cd-1-slave" or "slave1-cd"
> > > or
> > > "1-atapi-slave" would be expanded to /dev/disk/ide/atapi/1/slave/0/
> > > raw.
> > Thanks, I also thought of doing something like, but, er, well, was
> > too
> > lazy. ;-)
>
> No problem - I just wanted to check out how it works ;-)
> BTW I really think the session module shouldn't return B=5FBAD=5FFILE if
> everything worked okay.

Yep, the other modules return B_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND when the supplied index is
out of range, which is probably more appropriate (though the strerror()
translation doesn't fit that well).

CU, Ingo

PS: Can anyone tell me, why I put the whole disk_scanner FS module
API into headers/private? We don't want to officially disallow creation of
third party session/partition(/FS) modules, do we?
BTW, that raises the question of versioning.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.