Re: Improvements and thoughts on small projects for advocacy

It is amazing how you keep digging up additional mandates for the
OpenBSD project!

Brilliant work.

I'm wondering if you have an view on our UFO research?


Justina Colmena ~biz <[email protected]> wrote:

>=20
>=20
>=20
> On May 15, 2020 3:04:06 AM AKDT, jeanfrancois <[email protected]> wro=
te:
> >Justine,
> >
> >No one except a few people probably make OpenBSD so you won't
> >find what you expect here, except what you put in if we can say so.
> There is too much "help" out there, and no enterprise to speak of. The ri=
sk of criminal prosecution is too high, people are dealing drugs on OpenBSD=
, and the cops are cracking down, but it sure ain't the dealers taking the =
fall for the drugs in any court of law. It's us "users" who haven't paid ou=
r dues for "protection" from the usual extortion rackets in town, not that =
we actually made a "choice" of our own free will to do anything illegal.
>=20
> >
> >So it depends upon if you find it worthwhile to investigate.
> >
> >I deeply think OpenBSD needs to remain small that's all, but it's free
> A small trusted (audited) code base is great: lean and mean is definitely=
 the right spirit, but some of the underlying hardware and the interfaces t=
o connect to it are getting out of hand. It's  undocumented, or poorly docu=
mented, subject to NDA and exclusive agreements with SCO and MSFT.
>=20
> I would need to get basic laptop hardware recognized and booted properly =
before I'm SWATted, trespassed off the property, arrested, and end up havin=
g all my computer equipment confiscated by corrupt thin-blue-line-flag cops=
 on the take.
>=20
> No I'm not blaming OpenBSD, don't take it that way. It's the Chaos Comput=
er Club, the Cult of the Dead Cow, and similar groups who have gotten into =
the U.S. government and gained the ability to file and prosecute arbitrary =
criminal charges against Targeted Individuals.
>=20
> >you can use it if you like, and even create projects and then let us
> >know about it.
> Nice. I can "use" it, "responsibly," I presume. I'm not a "hacker" and I'=
m not breaking any laws and I'm not taking anyone's paid job away by using =
open source.
> >
> >That's what advocacy also is for.
> Well I probably do need an attorney to defend myself against all the civi=
l and criminal allegations from the SCO team et alia, or I would, except al=
l those attorneys are on Facebook and Twitter, they use Microsoft Windows i=
n the office, and they're in trouble with the bar because they're all THIEV=
ES IN LAW (=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=80=D1=8B =D0=B2 =D0=B7=D0=B0=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BD=
=D0=B5) hard at work stealing money, confiscating property, and REVOKING ba=
sic human rights and dignities "on vice" for life without recourse.
>=20
> Sorry for the rant, but somehow we've got to get a grip on serious organi=
zed crime, somehow grab those guys by their scruffy white collars or dirty =
blue collars or whatever is the requisite clothing for their chosen profess=
ion or vocation, haul *them* into their own court system, make *them* face =
the charges for their crimes, rather than allowing them to live a life of c=
rime and use their court system as a tool against us.
>=20
> --=20
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>=20