Re: Thanks
justina colmena ~biz <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:31:49 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All of a sudden I'm on a mailing list again. And it's private off-list reply by default. OpenBSD pf does seem much simpler and easier to understand than Linux iptables etc., but then again there are cops who ride horses and lawyers who serve as squires and it appears some non-sensical jurisdictional issues with service of process and summons to appear in a court of law as to where the development actually takes place, horse and carriage and blacksmithing issues, prisoners who make license plates etc., and what are the males smoking when the ladies are all meeting at the hookah lounges and opium dens? Not to pick on OpenBSD, say the same thing about any of the Linux-oriented conventions or the new social networks popping up. The MS Windows // Chromebook // Apple OS only crowd. The intellectual property shenanigans again. Little bit worrisome. What if it were real property instead of "intellectual" property these law clowns were documenting? On 11/17/24 21:51, bsdbsdbsd1 wrote: > > > /Open/*BSD* <https://www.openbsd.org/index.html> PF - Packet > Filtering > > Passing traffic > https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#pass > > is more pedagogical then the book PF. > > Thanks. > > Best regards > John Scofield > >