Re: Wireguard doesn't seem to work on macppc 7.8

On May 14, 2026 4:38:35 PM GMT+02:00, Alexandr Nedvedicky <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 03:54:19PM +0200, Gabriele Vento wrote:
></snip>
>> >
>> >    can you share output of `ifconfig wg` for both tunnel ends?
>> On my end it is outputs
>>     wg0: flags=80c3<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1300
>>         description: ...
>>         index 8 priority 0 llprio 3
>>         wgport 22670
>>         wgpubkey ...
>>         wgpeer ...
>>             wgpsk (present)
>>             wgpka 15 (sec)
>>             wgendpoint 15.204.55.83 42070
>>             tx: 7844, rx: 0
>>             wgaip 15.204.55.83/10
>>         groups: wg
>>         inet ... netmask 0xffffffff
>> 
>> For the other end of the tunnel, I do not own that endpoint so I cannot provide the output.
>> >    optionally content of /etc/hostname.wgX on both endpoints.
>> My system does not appear to possess that file.
>
>    sorry I was not clear enough in my first email.
>    because your wireguard VPN endpoint uses wg0 interface,
>    then there should be file /etc/hostname.wg0. The file naming
>    and more details on this can be found in hostname.if(5) manual page
>    (just run 'man hostname.if' on command line)
I know, I just do not have the /etc/hostname.wg0 file.
>> 
>> >    Make sure to redact/remove any keys for tunnel.  I suspect
>> >    there might be issue with wgaip settings which Stuart mentioned.
>> >
>> >    also if you can check output of
>> >        route get $IP_address_reached_over_tunnel
>> >    command should help us to tell the routing works as expected,
>> >    you can use remote tunnel peer's address.
>> Sure, here is the output:
>>     route to: 15.204.55.83
>>     destination: 0.0.0.0
>>     mask: 0.0.0.0
>>     gateway: 10.34.116.212
>>     interface: gem0
>>     if address: 10.34.116.145
>>     priority: 8 (static)
>>     flags: <UP,GATEWAY,DONE,STATIC>
>>     label: dhcpleased
>>     use mtu expire
>>     39 0 0
>>     sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,LABEL>
>
>    I think output of 'route get' points at a problem. it looks like all
>    packets use a default gateway, including packets which should be forwarded
>    using wireguard tunnel (wg0 interface).
>
>You redacted IP address of wg0 interface when sharing ifconfig output,
>This is important detail in puzzle. If I understand things right it
>does not work because of misconfiguration. It could be a wrong address/mask
>combination is assigned to wg0 interface. I think this is where you
>need to look at next.
The IP is the same I put as the Address field in the Wireguard configuration.
>hope it helps
>regards
>sashan