Re: Wireguard doesn't seem to work on macppc 7.8

Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> Thu, 14 May 2026 18:42:27 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026/05/14 19:37, Gabriele Vento wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 14, 2026 7:32:52 PM GMT+02:00, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On 2026/05/14 18:37, Gabriele Vento wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On May 14, 2026 6:02:01 PM GMT+02:00, Alexandr Nedvedicky <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Gabriele Vento wrote:
> >> ></snip>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    the inet is 100.65.0.138
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    However I think it should be from the same network which is allowed
> >> >> >    by wgaip option. Perhaps you should run:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >	ifconfig wg0 15.204.55.83/10
> >> >> That also does not work befause the problem is actually that the allowed IP
> >> >> is wrong, not the inet. In fact, any IP I try to allow results in the wgaip
> >> >> field being set to the endpoint ip (15.204.55.84) with whatever subnet mask I
> >> >> specified, even IPs not under 100.0.0.0/8.
> >> >
> >> >    So it looks like the tool you use to set up the tunnel is broken.
> >> >    you should be able to use ifconfig(8). try to follow steps in
> >> >    Solene's blog it did work well for me recently.
> >> I tried following the blog, currently /etc/hostname.wg0 contains
> >>     wgkey <privkey>
> >>     wgpeer k/QiJlbMakMKgTCHVt8/D+8k4DzRVM6U33F3gMZfRUg= wgendpoint 15.204.55.83 42070 wgpsk <presharedkey> wgaip 100.64.0.0/10
> >>     inet 100.65.0.138/32
> >
> >the thing that you don't have is anything telling the machine what
> >traffic to send to the wg interface.
> >
> >(wgaip is a dual purpose thing, firstly it allows you to set which
> >addresses the peer may send from, secondly it is a selector to choose
> >which amongst a number of peers to send traffic to, *but* only once it
> >has already been directed to the wg interface via the normal route
> >table).
> >
> >you haven't described what you're actually trying to route over the
> >tunnel, but using a /32 on this is probably not what you want here.
> >maybe /10 if you're trying to route all of the 100.64/10 SHARED-NETWORK
> >(CGN) address space over it.
> I understand, should i change the inet address to use /10?

It depends how the other side is configured.

> I am also trying to route all network traffic to the interface. And following the blog I know I have to put a !route line, but any address I could think of using wasn't accepted as a gateway.
> >>     up
> >> 
> >> I tried various combinations, such as omitting the preshared key or putting it before the wgendpoint field, and also tried using 0.0.0.0/0 as allowed ip (so that it would have kept the /0 part) to no avail, it still does show 15.204.55.83 as wgaip when shown with `ifconfig wg`, and even when the mask is /0 it doesn't let me ping any IP in the network.
> >> 
> >> >good luck.
> >> >regards
> >> >sashan
> >> >
> >
>