Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src
"Theo de Raadt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kirill A. Korinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: [email protected] 2026/08/22 08:04:42 > > Modified files: > share/misc : airport > > Log message: > airport: marked ISL, SXF, TXL and YKZ closed, add VDE I mean to say, I don't see the the point of these markers. Why do does this format suddenly allow (closed) as a grammar item? Shall we put (open) on all the others? Why does this matter. Did you get all the closed ones, or is there now going to be frantic wasted time trying to update all the other names? These names remain historic, until periods when IATA reallocates an airport code in South Korea and puts it in Swaziland (name at the time), because the coding space is limited at 3 letters and there are other also other considerations. What does this (closed) actually help.