Re: ie(4) v.s. dhcpd(8) & tcpdump(8)
Michael Shalayeff <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:17:30 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.hppa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Brian A. Seklecki:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Paul Weissmann wrote:
>
> > > i notice someone uploaded a newer snapshot into
> > > "/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/hppa" .. i'm assuming these are from the -current
> > > branch? The uname(1) is kind of vague, it still says 3.3 (i'm used to the
> > > NetBSD release engineering schedule which uses a naming scheme in vers.h)
>
> yea that's precisely what i ended up doing after that last mail, i grabbed
> the kernel from the snapshot and it solved the problem.
>
> now before i go diving into compiling -current, it's been a while, and i'm
> rather spoiled w/ NetBSD's build.sh (bootstraping the toolchain, etc.)
>
> Is my safest bet to bring my userland up-to-date with a binary snapshot
> and then grab -current from CVS -rHEAD and roll from there?
cd /usr/src
cvs up -PAd
cd /sys/arch/hppa/conf
config GENERIC
cd ../compile/GENERIC
make depend && make
cp bsd /
reboot
cd /usr/src
make obj
make build
is that that hard?
> Today's kernel sources from CVS won't even "make depend" against my
> userland from the 1 month old snapshot.
what do you mean?
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)