Re: nat64

Simon Perreault <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:36:59 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.os.openbsd.ipv6
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Le 2014-03-12 17:22, St=E9phane Guedon a =E9crit :
>>>         inet 192.168.87.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast
>>>         192.168.87.255
>>
>> Does that mean that you intend to do double NAT? NAT64 then NAT44?
>=20
> I don't really intend, but have no choice...
> I didn't think of that aspect. Is that important ?

Not really, no. It should work. Just curious what people actually do
with our NAT64 code... :)

Simon