Re: nat64

Le mercredi 12 mars 2014, 17:51:02 Simon Perreault a =E9crit :
> Le 2014-03-12 17:48, St=E9phane Guedon a =E9crit :
> > The fact is that, now, your code don't work because I don't
> > understand how to set it up. I have had a look at all the doc
> > found on internet (official or not) and can' figure how how to
> > transform 64:ff9b::/96 to inet and back.
>
> Well, your pf rule looks good. But you haven't shown us what makes
> you think it doesn't work. What did you investigate? Did you do
> tcpdump on ingress and egress interfaces? etc. etc. Show us your
> homework!
>
> Simon

I tried telnet -6 twitter.com (or other famous ipv4-only websites) on
the server itself, or on my desktop.

This desktop access ipv6 world (v6.facebook and others) through the
server without problem (so I assume the routing doesn't have any
problem).

the dns send well good adresses (64:ff9b::c710:9c06 and
64:ff9b::c710:9c26 for twitter).

When I looked at the log or read it real time, pf says he doesn't
received anything. You may be right. maybe the pf rule is good...

eventhough, why there's nothing ?

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature whi=
ch had a name of signature.asc]