Re: current status of computers
[email protected] (Donald Bruce Stewart) Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:15:41 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.mac68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
mreindl: > Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have then 2 other cards, a 10/100 card and a wonderful Apple NuBus > > card with a 68000+SONIC chip (that is supported by no one) that "work". > > They get more or less recognized at boot being no MAC is recognized and > > they no not work afterwards as etherent cards. But they don't "disturb" > > the boot process (well, taking the cards out totally works too, but I > > wanted to check what hapened with other cards so I dismounted every mac > > that had an ethernet card I could get my hands on). > > > > If "the other" NIC not being "the one" with the Sonic chip shows up as > supported by ae(4) and the driver doesn't seem to get the MAC address > (i.e. it shows something like: ae0 at nubus0: address 00:00:00:00:00:00 I have exactly this problem. It has been fixed in NetBSD too. Maybe a correct patch could be found from there? (I think I posted about this a couple of years ago?). > , type Farallon EtherWave Nubus, 32KB) you could try the diff below. > I don't know if there are any 100Mbit ae(4)s, but it might be worth a > try. Dmesg output would be helful. > > Blame xsa@ if it blows up your machine, but it helped my ae(4) :) -- Don