m68k not working past 3.5 (was: mac68k install process)
Frank Garcia <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:51:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.mac68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is all I've seen on it. Begin forwarded message: > From: Ted Unangst <[email protected]> > Date: April 19, 2004 5:52:34 PM CDT > To: [email protected] > Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src > > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: [email protected] 2004/04/19 16:52:33 > > Modified files: > sys/kern : kern_sysctl.c uipc_mbuf.c > sys/sys : sysctl.h > sys/uvm : uvm_extern.h uvm_init.c uvm_km.c uvm_km.h > > Log message: > introduce a new km_page allocator that gets pages from kernel_map using > an interrupt safe thread. > use this as the new backend for mbpool and mclpool, eliminating the > mb_map. > introduce a sysctl kern.maxclusters which controls the limit of > clusters > allocated. > testing by many people, works everywhere but m68k. ok deraadt@ > > this essentially deprecates the NMBCLUSTERS option, don't use it. > this should reduce pressure on the kmem_map and the uvm reserve of > static > map entries. > On Jul 2, 2004, at 9:34 AM, Matt R wrote: > Well thats kinda crappy ;-) > > Seriously, I understand why dropping mac68k makes > sense. I 'll just raise a glass in its honor tonight > when I get home. > > As far as it being broken, what exactly IS broken? > I'll admit I haven't kept up on m68k as much as I used > to, (was just looking into getting my mac68k 3.3 > machine upraded; last nights install was on the test > machine), so I may have missed the "it's broken" > email. > > And how broken is it? I'll admit that if I offered > help for fixing/keeping m68k up to date, I'll probably > be way in over my head, but sink or swin, right? > > --Matt > >> Matt R wrote: >>> Hey list >>> >>> after struggling with the mac68k installer, I've >>> decided I wanted to do something about it. I seem >> to >>> remember a conversation with the list back when >> 3.3 >>> was new...something to the effect of " we have the >>> source but can't compile it ". >>> >>> If someone would be so kind as to point me at said >>> source and what tools they need or just let me >> know >>> what tools they need, I will find/get/buy/whatever >> to >>> get the freaking installer updated. >> >> > ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.5/mac68k/utils/ > Installer_1.3_src.sea.hqx >> >> Can't remember what compiler this thing uses, it is >> on the MacOS >> platform. It is pretty clearly spelled out in the >> SEA file. At this >> point, the version used would be something like ten >> years old -- I'm not >> sure how much, if at all, the Mac world has kept >> producing 680x0 >> development tools. The hard part is finding it. >> >> However, a word of warning: All the m68k platforms >> have been broke for >> quite some time now, and I'm not aware of anyone >> actively working on a >> fix. You will note no snaps for any of the m68k >> platforms (hp300, >> mvme68k, mac68k) have been made since 3.5 was >> released. No, it isn't >> because we switched to gcc3 and are still waiting >> for the first snap to >> complete compilation... At this point, I somewhat >> suspect OpenBSD v3.6 >> will ship with a few less platforms. Evolving the >> installer at this >> point may not be overly productive. 8-/ >> >> Nick. >> -- >> http://www.holland-consulting.net >> >> > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail