Re: mac68k on Classic II panic (crossing guard)
Nick Holland <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:02:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.mac68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan Brosemer wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:19:24PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > > Dan Brosemer wrote: > > ... > > > > 2) The Mac Classic II is based on the LC-II. I haven't tried doing > > > > anything with my LC-II after verifing it DID boot OpenBSD some time > > > > back, however something has broke a lot of the older systems since > > > > then -- my LCIII and IIsi's stopped working some time back, and > > > > unfortunately, I have not persued getting the info to the appropriate > > > > knowledgable people. > > > But older versions of OpenBSD should work? Can you tell me about when it > > > stopped working so that I can pick a release to start from? > > AS I RECALL (whatever that is worth!), it worked for 3.1-release, and > > died very shortly afterwards. > > > > I *know* it worked for 3.0-release, and did not work for 3.2-release. > > This is disappointing. I see a very similar problem with 3.0-release and > nothing but a single hard disk on the scsi bus. Lemme pull my foot out of my mouth so I can answer... 8) My comments were quite unclear. I was refering to the systems I have: LCII, LCIII and IIsi, and that is it. The Mac68k platform has suffered from a relatively small number of users and a small amount of HW in the hands of key developers. My statement made it sound like I was *sure* it would work for you, and actually, I thought it would, but it was from semi-educated guess and the possibly bogus statement that the Classic II is based on the LC-II. Obviously, all it takes is one minor difference between the Classic II and the LC-II and things break. Nick. -- http://www.holland-consulting.net