Re: two openrsync caveats

Manuel Giraud <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Claudio Jeker <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 10:02:07AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote:
>> Thomas de Grivel <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>> > maybe ln -s /usr/bin/openrsync /usr/local/bin/rsync ?
>> 
>> Yes of course.  My patch was more for a better out of the box behavior.
>> Maybe it could pass tech@?
>
> Right now openrsync is limited in functionality and is primarily present
> for rpki-client. The limited functionality makes it unusable for generic
> use and so any diff or change like the above will not be considered since it
> is simply not ready.
>
> First problem to solve is to remove the mmap usage in openrsync. After
> that modern protocol versions need to be added. Once that is in place one
> can start a discussion about using openrsync as a default on OpenBSD.

Thanks for these explanations.  Why mmap usage should be removed?
-- 
Manuel Giraud
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.