Re: max rdomain limit 255

Claudio Jeker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 01:05:04PM +0200, ptr wrote:
> OK understand. Is a hypothetical 1023 still considered too large for this? 

1023 routing tables with 5 route each, no big deal.
1023 routing tables with 1.5 Mio routes each on the other hand is quite a
big deal.

So there is no answer to this question.
 
> Jun 9, 2026, 13:08 by [email protected]:
> 
> > On 2026-06-09, ptr <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, thanks for the clarification.
> >>
> >> In my case rdomain IDs are sequentially generated and allocated, so this would be less of an issue with memory pressure. I believe the 255 limit could be on the low end if a larger fleet of nodes is factored in and say each tenant's identical rdomain IDs must potentially exist on every node.
> >>
> >
> > besides memory use, some operations use sequential scans of the various
> > rtables present on the system (i.e. at least one per rdomain), and won't
> > scale well with a larger number.
> >
> >
> 

-- 
:wq Claudio
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.