Re: documentation

From Nick Holland <[email protected]>:
> dude.  you are the guy who proposed "chmod 0"ing files for security.

That was not a proposition, but I have my faults in that post as well
I apologise. That post was without a context, which I later mentioned
in the last post of the thread, I know you replied with a very good
intention, so I am very sorry about that. Sudden thoughts come without
context (or alteast for me). I was talking about 'doas' and chmod 0 to
hide it in a single user machine (when programs run as the user). So
this idea seemed sufficient.

> Considered.  Rejected.

That's fine, the cvs command you mentioned does the same thing without
needing another set of work of publishing the /faq/ archived in the
website.

> And you probably have no comprehension of how pissed off I am at you
> for that statement, demanding work of others you won't perform yourself
> and trivializing the effort.  I did this for quite a few years, it was
> a pain in the ass.  That was when many computers didn't have the easy
> ability to run a browser, and someone might have had use for it.
> It's 2026 now.

I was going off the lines that there was no other way than to crawl
and grab each pages with the command lacall mentioned in this thread
or something I came up with myself. I had not known about that cvs
command (or cvs itself). I am terribly sorry for not mentioning that
fact.

Also, I do not really mean to be rude after all this, but being 2026
has nothing to do with this. Computers had easy ability to run browsers
since the 90s