Re: question about tbrsize

W dniu 2011-02-10 17:27, Stuart Henderson pisze:
> On 2011/02/10 12:10, RLW wrote:
>> I am asking this because i was writing to the misc group about low
>> performance on lan bandtwith
>> (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=128990880310013&w=2) and someone
>> said there might be a TBR related problem.
>>
>>
>> For the more i found somebodys work on trying to make adaptive tbr:
>> http://www.junkpile.org/openbsd/base/altq_tbradapt.diff
>>
>> Was it officially adapted?? or maybe there is some developer working on it?
>
> it's not committed and needs some changes to the configuration method
> before it can be accepted. it's unlikely to be useful on your fast
> ports, it's mainly to calculate bandwidth in a more correct manner
> when taking adsl overheads into account.
>
>

ok and what about first part of my post, about setting tbrsize in pf.conf?

altq on em0 cbq bandwidth 1Gb tbrsize 4K queue { q_lan }
queue q_lan bandwidth 950Mb cbq (default)

i got error:
root@router-test (/root)# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
/etc/pf.conf:9: syntax error
/etc/pf.conf:10: queue q_lan has no parent
/etc/pf.conf:10: errors in queue definition
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded

without tbrsize altq definition is ok.


---
best regards,
RLW