Re: nat-to and route-to specified in a single rule

Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:48:13 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.os.openbsd.pf
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 2011/06/07 17:36, Rob Sessink wrote:
> You’re right, looking again at this rule, it is unwanted to do
> the NAT on the inbound packets of the internal interface when the
> firewall is connected to multiple networks/interfaces.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer to pf.conf(5). But what is meant with the
> statement a ‘local IP address’ in this context?.

An address on the local machine.