Re: pf ruleset parser re: tag and tagged
Kenneth Gober <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:40:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.pf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANHrbpfQ5wX9VNtKaoX3cex92XWVC-+fu_X0F=7bDz413dcZdw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:20 PM, S. Donaldson <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that tag references are not dynamically defined [ unless perhaps they are used in authpf scenarios? ]. Would it make sense for the parser to issue a warning if a 'tagged value' references appear but no defining 'tag value' is found in a ruleset? A warning would make sense. Definitely not an error though, since the 'tag value' rule might be added later in an anchor. I wonder how many people have gotten the bright idea of adding 'tagged xyz' to comment out a rule without disturbing the rule numbering... -ken