Re: [UPDATE] net/i2pd: update to 2.61.0
Andrew Kloet <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:24:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.ports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Resending to the ports@, accidentally sent direct to the author earlier. On Wed Jul 22, 2026 at 7:33 AM EDT, David Uhden Collado wrote: > The unveil support added in the latest i2pd release does not account for > the fact that OpenBSD commonly uses /var instead of /var/lib. > > I had to make a small code change so that unveil works correctly with > the default paths used by the OpenBSD port. I looked at the upstream implementation for pledge/unveil. It's riddled with errors, typos, and wicked code smells. It's quite frankly appalling that it got merged. It's apparent it was merged with little to no testing. It will cause problems. I encourage you to take a look at it yourself. [1] > bool openbsd_unevil_enabled; Seriously? I'm going to rewrite it for upstream. [1] https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd/pull/2403 -- Andrew
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQQDYAWAj/Md1ZRJrhK0H7x/oPHhDgUCamC2ZAAKCRC0H7x/oPHh DlQEAQDY9YB7O1hyN6rwWNgbvoRGLG9H8S6vXGxqWKt1Q2OHvQEA2UZTKhvXddxN FWKDbDjmnS3CyvJi/hdTbPYtABeerQA= =+Wf3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----