Re: ffmpeg-9.0.1 against firefox and friends

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.ports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 12:20:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> On 2026/08/19 12:35, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > So, we're waiting Tor Browser which may or may not be released in September?
> > 
> > Let me quote their blog:
> > 
> > > For the remainder of this release cycle, we will be focusing on auditing
> > > these issues and fixing bugs until the 16.0 alpha series is ready to
> > > become Tor Browser Stable 16.0. We are optimistically targeting a
> > > September release, which would put us one month ahead of schedule compared
> > > to last year.
> > 
> > Not sure that it is good idea, because we need some room to fix that is
> > fixed, special if release is targeted in October.
> > 
> > I plan to go in patches to bring support of ffmpeg-9.0 this week, continue
> > run my bulk and I think that the next week, if amd64 / arm64 bulks are ok
> > with that fixes, is good time to go ffmpeg-9.0.1 in.
> > 
> > At least it buys a few weeks to test and fix before the lock.
> 
> If we want FFmpeg 9.x for OpenBSD 8.0 (which is probably a good thing as
> far as 8.0-stable is concerned), it needs to go in soon. It's used by
> 100+ ports and we're not going to get good runtime testing across archs
> until some time after snapshot packages are available.
> 
> I think it's better to patch Tor Browser to work with it rather than
> wait for a new release at an unknown date.

yeah i've never said we should wait for tor browser to support it ootb,
rather to patch it by backporting
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2057577 :)

i also support ffmpeg 9 in the tree soonish to have some runtime
testing...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.