Re: OpenBSD Doesn't Support 64-Bit Intel
"STeve Andre'" <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:16:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.smp,gmane.os.openbsd.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/01/13 00:06, Jash Sefferson wrote: > Hi guys. > > I=E2=80=99m a civil engineer by day and use OpenBSD at night, but I=E2=80= =99m trying to do > high-end CAD on my home PC and OpenBSD doesn=E2=80=99t support 64-bit I= ntel chips. > > Don't believe me? It says very clearly at the OpenBSD/amd64 page: =E2=80= =9CAll > versions of the AMD Athlon 64 processors and their clones are supported= .=E2=80=9D > But does not mention or list any Intel chips. Not one. > > Wtf? I can do CAD on my i7-980X under Windows 7 SP 1, but I=E2=80=99d r= ather > use something secure and responsibly coded like OpenBSD. Except that I > can't. > > Why for the life of this platform are we not on the only future directi= on > for the platform? And I mean that literally. Neither AMD nor Intel sell= s > 32-bit chips anymore. If OpenBSD remains stuck at 32 bits, people will = stop > using and developing for it. > > Who makes the decision to keep OpenBSD off of 64-bit Intel? And why the > hell are they doing so? > > -jash > > Um.... I'm writing this on an amd64 Thinkpad W500 which has a 2.8GHz core two duo. So I don't understand what you mean. --STeve Andre'