Re: disk geometry issues when trying to set up encrypted partition
George Morgan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.misc,gmane.os.openbsd.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20100617073913.ahqb8c784k4s0ckc-trbetr_zbetna@webmail.spamcop.net> |
Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:45:40PM -0400, George Morgan wrote: > >> Quoting Harry Palmer <[email protected]>: >> >> >Hi there. >> > >> >I'm fairly new to openbsd and I'm hoping someone with better >> >understanding than me of how its disk handling works can help. >> > >> >Beginning my effort to encrypt a 300GB drive in a 64bit Ultrasparc, >> >I followed these initial steps: >> > >> >1. used disklabel to create a single slice "a" on the drive >> > >> >2. made a file system with newfs (is it necessary to have so many >> > backup superblocks?) >> > >> >3. mounted sd2a on "/home/cy" and touched it with an empty file >> > "/home/cy/cryptfile" >> > >> >4. zeroed out the file (and efectively the drive) with >> > "dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/cy/cryptfile bs=512" >> > >> > >> >Here's the (eventual!) output of (4): >> > >> > /home/cy: write failed, file system is full >> > dd: /home/cy/cryptfile: No space left on device >> > 576520353+0 records in >> > 576520352+0 records out >> > 295178420224 bytes transferred in 19810.722 secs (14899932 bytes/sec) >> > >> > >> > >> >Now I have: >> > >> > # disklabel sd2a >> > # /dev/rsd2a: >> > type: SCSI >> > disk: SCSI disk >> > label: MAW3300NC >> > flags: vendor >> > bytes/sector: 512 >> > sectors/track: 930 >> > tracks/cylinder: 8 >> > sectors/cylinder: 7440 >> > cylinders: 13217 >> > total sectors: 585937500 >> > rpm: 10025 >> > interleave: 1 >> > boundstart: 0 >> > boundend: 585937500 >> > drivedata: 0 >> > >> > 16 partitions: >> > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] >> > a: 585937200 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 >> > c: 585937500 0 unused >> > >> > >> >and: >> > >> > # ls -l /home/cy >> > total 576661216 >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 295178420224 Jun 16 03:39 cryptfile >> > >> > >> >and: >> > >> > # df -h >> > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> > /dev/sd0a 1007M 44.8M 912M 5% / >> > /dev/sd0k 247G 2.0K 235G 0% /home >> > /dev/sd0d 3.9G 6.0K 3.7G 0% /tmp >> > /dev/sd0f 2.0G 559M 1.3G 29% /usr >> > /dev/sd0g 1007M 162M 795M 17% /usr/X11R6 >> > /dev/sd0h 5.9G 212K 5.6G 0% /usr/local >> > /dev/sd0j 2.0G 2.0K 1.9G 0% /usr/obj >> > /dev/sd0i 2.0G 2.0K 1.9G 0% /usr/src >> > /dev/sd0e 7.9G 7.7M 7.5G 0% /var >> > /dev/sd2a 275G 275G -13.7G 105% /home/cy >> > >> > >> > >> >I have no understanding of this. I've never seen a df output >> >that tells me I'm using 13GB more space than the drive is >> >capable of holding. >> > >> >I ask here because there's obviously potential for me to lose >> >data somewhere down the line. I'll be grateful if anyone can >> >explain where I've gone wrong. >> >> I've seen the greater than 100% full on a UFS? filesystem before when >> you exceed the size of the filesystem. There is space in the >> filesystem for "lost+found" and all those superblocks? you were >> complaining about that can get overwritten if you write too much to a >> partition. > > Spoace for superblocks and other metadata is subtracted from available > blocks. lost+found is an ordinary directory. > >> >> So setting up your "dd" to actually stop before you overfill the >> filesystem is what you need to do. (using bs=# count=# ... info you >> can get before you start initializing your file with the df command >> without the "-k or -h" to get number of blocks and block size) >> >> I'm sure the fine people on these lists will correct me if I'm wrong >> in my assumptions... :-) > > You are wrong, there;s no such thing as overfilling a filesystem. It's > just the 5% reserved for root. An ordinary user runs out earlier. It's > in the FAQ. > Sorry for the misinformation. Thanks for the education. George Morgan