Re: Need accelerated 24 bit video - wsfb driver for Expert3D-lite not working

Peter Sprague <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.sparc
Organization GeoVision Environmental
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the honest appraisals.

Already decided to bite the bullet this morning and get a slightly used 
AMD workstation.  While I enjoy the challenges, ultimately computers are 
a tool for me to perform work.  The x86 path offers time to devote to 
web mapping ideas instead of wrestling with arcane hardware.

Had Sun hardware since my grad school days, and still have a number of 
more recent vintage AMD rack mounts, but with Oracle buying them out, 
its time to let it go.

Peter

On 11-09-15 01:20 PM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:54:06PM -0700, Peter Sprague wrote:
>> Everything works fine and within the stated capabilities of the
>> wildcatfb driver.  I understand that the wildcatfb driver is only
>> unaccelerated 8 bits, but I thought the wsfb driver was supposed to
>> be able to provide accelerated 24 bit depth.  That is what I
>> attempting to get operating.
> wsfb has no acceleration either.
>> The wsfb driver seems to fail when I force its use with 8 bit - 24
>> bit.
> Yes the reason for which wildcatfb exists is that the frame buffer
> layout of ifb(4) is weird and difficult to support in wsfb.
>
>> Is there a recommended video card for the Blade 1000 that will give
>> me the operational performance I need?
>>
>> Seems like my Blade will become a brick unless I go back to Solaris.
> I think there may be some ATI based framebuffers (PGX24, XVR-100,
> XVR-300) that are supported in a Blade 1000 and can use the
> xf86-video-mach64 or xf86-video-radeon drivers with 24bpp and 2D
> acceleration. but I'm not sure, since I don't have access to any of
> those framebuffers. Other OpenBSD developpers probably know better.
>
> Honestly if you need graphics performance, give up on sparc64 and get
> a cheap x86 based machine (even a 7-8 years old one with a supported
> card will outperform any other architecture under X on OpenBSD, and
> not only because it's the only architecture that gets attention from
> X.Org developpers).
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.