Re: ldom question
Henning Brauer <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:36:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Scarlett <[email protected]> [2015-04-07 19:32]: > On 07/04/2015 15:12, Jeremiah Ford wrote: > >My last question, a perhaps less constructive one, why isn't this more widely used? There are so many people running OpenBSD on Linux KVM, I would think that this is the solution they have been looking for. > >Thanks again, already read the manual for ldomctl, plan on finishing reading Sun's docs next. > Lack of mindshare is the primary reason. Well. The sparc64 ldoms are dog slow compared to the usual amd64 virtualization options, with a comparable power budget and hardware cost rather much higher than lower. I wish it was different :( The static config requiring a host/dom0/$preferred_nomenclature reboot to reassign CPUs etc is also hindering - but the above really is the killer. > For most cheap VPS providers Linux is considered the primary target, with > the exception of a few like RootBSD, where FreeBSD is the focus. It'd be > nice if there was someone providing OpenBSD-backed SPARC64, though. We use ldoms for some services internally, writing the systems integration for automatic config/deployment, start/stop, console access etc never made sense from the business PoV. <shameless plug> if you really want a sparc64 ldom, poke me and I'm sure we can work sth out. </shameless plug> -- Henning Brauer, [email protected], [email protected] BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS. Virtual & Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/