Re: are you running under the perl debugger ?

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 09:55:54AM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 01:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 02:22:35PM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > > The following snippet:
> > > > 
> > > > can be used to determine if I am running under perl -d.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm wondering if there's something cleaner.
> > > 
> > > I asked at work and millert@'s neighbor Tom says he uses:
> > > 
> > >     sub am_running_perldb() {
> > >         no warnings "once";
> > >         return keys(%DB::sub) > 0;
> > >     }
> > > 
> > 
> > Nice... Indeed that's simpler.
> > 
> > Objections to me using some similar magic ?
> 
> None that I can think of.
> 
> 
> > Anyone having a magic way to handling eval {}; from within the debugguer ?
> 
> I asked, and Tom seemed a little surprised and (paraphrasing) said you
> should be able to (s)tep or (n)ext into eval blocks, but if that isn't
> working you could set an explicit (b)reak on the line you want to stop.
> Worst case you could add `DB::single = 1` right before in the code, but
> that is very seldom necessary.
> 
> Perhaps I misunderstood what "handling eval" means.

I think it works better than it used to...