Re: rpki-client: add rsync baseuri-based batching
Theo Buehler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 10:23:16AM +0000, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:57:13AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > Here is a refactor that introduces helpers for shortlist & skiplist. I
> > > don't think a 'len' member is needed if the needles used for search are
> > > right-sized.
> >
> > I would prefer not strdup-ing and keeping the existing logic to be
> > honest. I also don't think this requires yet another file.
>
> how about this? Pass a length into the search function.
I like this better. That more or less matches what I had in mind and I
think it will work for rsync as well.
Comments inline.
>
> Index: extern.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/extern.h,v
> diff -u -p -r1.287 extern.h
> --- extern.h 1 Jul 2026 11:09:12 -0000 1.287
> +++ extern.h 8 Jul 2026 10:20:43 -0000
> @@ -29,11 +29,16 @@
>
> #define MAX_MSG_SIZE (50 * 1024 * 1024)
>
> -struct fqdnlistentry {
> - LIST_ENTRY(fqdnlistentry) entry;
> - char *fqdn;
> +struct strlistentry {
> + LIST_ENTRY(strlistentry) entry;
> + char *str;
> + size_t str_len;
> };
> -LIST_HEAD(fqdns, fqdnlistentry);
> +LIST_HEAD(strlist_head, strlistentry);
I would prefer omitting the _head here. I find such long struct names
hard to read and in this case it's rather unhelpful.
> +
> +void strlist_insert(struct strlist_head *, const char *);
> +int strlist_find(const struct strlist_head *, const char *, size_t);
> +void strlist_free(struct strlist_head *);
Do you anticipate using the strlist_free more than once? I think we can
do without this abstraction.
>
> enum cert_as_type {
> CERT_AS_ID, /* single identifier */
> Index: main.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.309 main.c
> --- main.c 24 Jun 2026 09:06:20 -0000 1.309
> +++ main.c 8 Jul 2026 10:20:44 -0000
> @@ -85,8 +85,49 @@ int64_t evaluation_time = X509_TIME_MIN
>
> struct stats stats;
>
> -struct fqdns shortlist = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(fqdns);
> -struct fqdns skiplist = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(fqdns);
> +static struct strlist_head shortlist = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(shortlist);
> +static struct strlist_head skiplist = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(skiplist);
> +
> +void
> +strlist_insert(struct strlist_head *strlist, const char *str)
> +{
> + struct strlistentry *sle;
> +
> + if ((sle = malloc(sizeof(*sle))) == NULL)
I would prefer calloc(), but others might disagre :)
> + err(1, NULL);
> +
> + if ((sle->str = strdup(str)) == NULL)
> + err(1, NULL);
> +
> + sle->str_len = strlen(sle->str);
> +
> + LIST_INSERT_HEAD(strlist, sle, entry);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +strlist_find(const struct strlist_head *strlist, const char *str, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct strlistentry *sle;
> +
> + LIST_FOREACH(sle, strlist, entry) {
> + if (sle->str_len == len && strncasecmp(str, sle->str, len) == 0)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +strlist_free(struct strlist_head *strlist)
> +{
> + struct strlistentry *sle, *sle_tmp;
> +
> + LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(sle, strlist, entry, sle_tmp) {
> + LIST_REMOVE(sle, entry);
> + free(sle->str);
> + free(sle);
> + }
> +}
>
> /*
> * Log a message to stderr if and only if "verbose" is non-zero.
> @@ -509,7 +550,6 @@ static void
> queue_add_from_cert(const struct cert *cert, struct nca_tree *ncas)
> {
> struct repo *repo;
> - struct fqdnlistentry *le;
> char *nfile, *npath, *host;
> const char *uri, *repouri, *file;
> size_t hostsz, repourisz;
> @@ -520,21 +560,13 @@ queue_add_from_cert(const struct cert *c
> host = cert->repo + RSYNC_PROTO_LEN;
> hostsz = strcspn(host, "/");
>
> - LIST_FOREACH(le, &skiplist, entry) {
> - if (strlen(le->fqdn) == hostsz &&
> - strncasecmp(host, le->fqdn, hostsz) == 0) {
> - warnx("skipping %s (listed in skiplist)", cert->repo);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (strlist_find(&skiplist, host, hostsz)) {
> + warnx("skipping %s (listed in skiplist)", cert->repo);
> + return;
> }
>
> - LIST_FOREACH(le, &shortlist, entry) {
> - if (strlen(le->fqdn) == hostsz &&
> - strncasecmp(host, le->fqdn, hostsz) == 0) {
> - shortlisted = 1;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + shortlisted = strlist_find(&shortlist, host, hostsz);
> +
I think we can drop shortlisted and do:
if (shortlistmode && !strlist_find(&shortlist, host, hostsz)) {
> if (shortlistmode && shortlisted == 0) {
> if (verbose)
> warnx("skipping %s (not shortlisted)", cert->repo);
> @@ -881,7 +913,6 @@ tal_load_default(void)
> static void
> load_skiplist(const char *slf)
> {
> - struct fqdnlistentry *le;
> FILE *fp;
> char *line = NULL;
> size_t linesize = 0, linelen;
> @@ -910,12 +941,8 @@ load_skiplist(const char *slf)
> if (!valid_uri(line, linelen, NULL))
> errx(1, "invalid entry in skiplist: %s", line);
>
> - if ((le = malloc(sizeof(struct fqdnlistentry))) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> - if ((le->fqdn = strdup(line)) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> + strlist_insert(&skiplist, line);
>
I'd drop the extra empty line.
> - LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&skiplist, le, entry);
> stats.skiplistentries++;
> }
> if (ferror(fp))
> @@ -931,18 +958,11 @@ load_skiplist(const char *slf)
> static void
> load_shortlist(const char *fqdn)
> {
> - struct fqdnlistentry *le;
> -
> if (!valid_uri(fqdn, strlen(fqdn), NULL))
> errx(1, "invalid fqdn passed to -q: %s", fqdn);
>
> - if ((le = malloc(sizeof(struct fqdnlistentry))) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> -
> - if ((le->fqdn = strdup(fqdn)) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> + strlist_insert(&shortlist, fqdn);
>
zap empty line
> - LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&shortlist, le, entry);
> }
>
> static void
> Index: nca.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/nca.c,v
> diff -u -p -r1.8 nca.c
> --- nca.c 8 Jul 2026 05:33:28 -0000 1.8
> +++ nca.c 8 Jul 2026 10:20:44 -0000
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ certidcmp(const struct nonfunc_ca *a, co
>
> RB_GENERATE(nca_tree, nonfunc_ca, entry, certidcmp);
>
> -static LIST_HEAD(, fqdnlistentry) notifys = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(notifys);
> +static struct strlist_head batchlist = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(batchlist);
>
> static RB_HEAD(nca_hist_tree, nca_hist) ncas_hist = RB_INITIALIZER(&ncas_hist);
>
> @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ static void
> ncas_plan_retries(void)
> {
> struct nca_hist *nca_hist;
> - struct fqdnlistentry *fle, *fle_tmp;
> - size_t notify_len;
>
> RB_FOREACH(nca_hist, nca_hist_tree, &ncas_hist) {
> if (nca_decide_retry(nca_hist) == 0) {
> @@ -241,36 +239,21 @@ ncas_plan_retries(void)
> if (nca_hist->notify == NULL)
> continue;
>
> - if ((fle = malloc(sizeof(*fle))) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> -
> - if ((fle->fqdn = strdup(nca_hist->notify)) == NULL)
> - err(1, NULL);
> -
> - LIST_INSERT_HEAD(¬ifys, fle, entry);
> + strlist_insert(&batchlist, nca_hist->notify);
Fine to leave it as-is, but I wonder if the logic should not be inverted
to be the shorter:
if (nca_hist->notify != NULL)
strlist_insert(&batchlist, nca_hist->notify);
Perhaps reconsider this once the rsync batching tweak has taken proper
shape.
> }
>
> RB_FOREACH(nca_hist, nca_hist_tree, &ncas_hist) {
> if (nca_hist->notify == NULL)
> continue;
>
> - notify_len = strlen(nca_hist->notify);
> -
> - LIST_FOREACH(fle, ¬ifys, entry) {
> - if (strlen(fle->fqdn) == notify_len &&
> - strncasecmp(nca_hist->notify, fle->fqdn,
> - notify_len) == 0) {
> - nca_hist->defer = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> + if (strlist_find(&batchlist, nca_hist->notify,
> + strlen(nca_hist->notify))) {
> + nca_hist->defer = 0;
> + break;
> }
> }
>
> - LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(fle, ¬ifys, entry, fle_tmp) {
> - LIST_REMOVE(fle, entry);
> - free(fle->fqdn);
> - free(fle);
> - }
> + strlist_free(&batchlist);
As noted towards the top, I don't really see much of a win here.
> }
>
> void