Re: sys/uvm: fix uao_dropswap() index typo
Kirill A. Korinsky <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:57:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:49:58 +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:28:23 +0200, > Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:48:47 +0200 > > > From: Kirill A. Korinsky <[email protected]> > > > > > > tech@, > > > > > > the loop variable indexes the current pgs[] batch, not the page within the > > > object. Pass the fetched page's object offset to uao_dropswap(), as the > > > other resident page callers do. > > > > > > Thoughts? Ok? > > > > Good find. Trying to think about what the consequences would be of > > this bug. I guess bad things may happen if we partially wire down an > > object and then unwire it again. Some other pages in the object will > > get their swap dropped if they're swapped out. > > > > Probably doesn't happen a lot. Possibly cuases corruption of GPU > > memory? > > > > Not sure that it is limited only to GPU memory. > > My daily driver had random crashed processes when almost all ram was used > and machine started to touch swap. > > Crashes was SIGABRT libc’s alloc. A few times it kills initd by the same > reason. > > As soon as I fixed it, machine seems much stabled. > The last and cleanest for investigation .core was from crashed pcscd and if I recall right it was calloc -> validate_junk -> abort() Unfortently that core was in /tmp and I rebooted machine, so it lost. -- wbr, Kirill