Re: Installing bootblocks on 3.2 snapshot
Sean Cavanaugh <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:56:20 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.vax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hugh Graham wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:43:46PM -0600, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I am trying to install the (Oct 4) snapshot on my uVAX 3100-80 after >>trying out VMS for a while. >> >>I installed via netboot from my i386 machine, and everything went well. >>The problem is that it will *NOT* boot from the disk. I have booted >>several times from the network trying to manually install bootblocks >>using "disklabel -B sd1", "disklabel -B /dev/rds1c -b sdboot" and some >>other such variations, but the system refuses to boot. The output from >>the console mode is > > The method sounds correct.. > > Try the (known working) bootblocks from: xxx Didn't work. I still get the same messages. I'll try installing 3.1, but maybe I need to try wiping the first few blocks on the disk. I did notice that the BSD part of the disk started at something like block 1153 on the Fujutsu and 10?? on the RZ57 > Anything special about the drives? One drive is a plain DEC RZ57, which used to have an OpenVMS 7.2 install on it, and the other is a Fujitsu M2494ES, which used to be in a Wintel box. > It may be worth testing if boot.mop (once loaded over the network) is > able to load a kernel off the drive. At the console chevron enter > "boot esa0", and then at the openbsd boot prompt try "boot sd(0)bsd", > or "boot sd(1,0)bsd". This is a longshot, and I'm not sure if it ever > worked reliably with scsi, so a negative result won't tell much. It says: getdisklabel: no disk label nfs_open: must mount first. Boot failed: Invalid argument > IIRC your system did run OpenBSD at one point. Does the release it > previously ran still work? The boot code was changed substantially > between 3.1 and 3.2, although it was tested working fine on systems > similar to the mv3100m80. It used to run 3.0 perfectly well, but I thought I'd try VMS (bleck), which required removing all the BSD stuff. I can try installing 3.0 or 3.1 on the machine and see what happens, which is what I'll do next. -- Sean Cavanaugh - Email: seanc at unixgeeks period ca