Re: plus48.html - few glitches, mostly to do with "prevented"
Marc Espie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:45:40PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote: > Hi, all. > > Reading the 4.8 list and I don't understand exactly what a lot of these are > trying to say ... maybe a search-and-replace gone wrong? > > Prevented pkg_add(1) update to silently ignore a pkgpath problem. No, that one is very technical, so if you haven't run into the problem and know what's going on it's not going to make sense. Most specifically, pkg_add finds candidates by looking at stem-* then checking that the pkgpath matches. It also needs some specific mechanism to silently ignore "older" packages and stuff that's already fully uptodate. The tests were a bit bogus, and not finding a matching package with correct pkgpath was lumped with "oh, older package found, no update needed" where it should say "hey, we found a correct stem-*, but no matching @pkgpath candidate, we should report that".