Re: faq13.html: bye bye opera-flashplugin

Nick Holland <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.www
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05/09/11 14:10, Nicolas P. M. Legrand wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:16:08PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2011-05-09, Antoine Jacoutot <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 9 May 2011, Nicolas P. M. Legrand wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:11:04PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 9 May 2011, Nicolas P. M. Legrand wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > www/opera-flashplugin has been removed
>> >> > 
>> >> > See faq/index.html :
>> >> > ... The Guide covers the active release of OpenBSD, currently v4.9...
>> >> 
>> >> oups :)
>> >
>> > Don't hesitate to re-post this diff in 6 months :)
> 
> :)
>  
>> or post a faq/current.html diff mentioning the removal and suggesting
>> that people can try gnash instead; this will act as a reminder in 6 months
>> time :-)

yes, I like this plan much better.

> 
> something like this?

yes, but a couple comments:

> Index: current.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/nlegrand/Repositories/cvsync/www/faq/current.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.263
> diff -u -r1.263 current.html
> --- current.html        5 May 2011 12:30:08 -0000       1.263
> +++ current.html        9 May 2011 18:05:44 -0000
> @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@
>  For more information consult the package README file or the general
>  SOGo Installation Guide installed with the package.
>  

Missing the <a name="..."> target (and the TOC entry at the top of the
page, too).  Being that there was already a #20110422 target, I made
this one 20110422a

> +<h3>2011/04/22 - [ports] www/opera-flashplugin removed</h3>
> +www/opera-flashplugin has been removed. You can install GNU Gnash as a
> +replacement.

being that I was committing this, I added a hidden comment to myself
about removing 13.14 as per your original diff, which I give myself a
50/50 chance of actually remembering to do when I generate
upgrade50.html, but at least you guys did your job and gave me an
opportunity to do it right. :)

> +
>  <a name="20110428"></a>
>  <h3>2011/04/28 - ftp-proxy(8) pf.conf change required</h3>
>  <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ftp-proxy&sektion=8">ftp-proxy(8)</a>

But yes, in general, anything people should know about for the next
release should go in current.html, both for -current followers and for
me to make a better upgradeXX.html file.

Thanks!

Nick.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.