Re: Nofollow in meta section in donations.html

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:18:00PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:49:54AM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was using this tag in the past. It's an alternative to /robots.txt.
> 
> I brought this up a while ago, with no diff and no resulting comments.
> Of course, if it's excluded by robots.txt then nofollow on the page
> doesn't matter. If it were *not* excluded in robots.txt, then nofollow
> would allow bots to index the page but not pay attention to links out.
> In the end there's little difference. I think more bots respect
> robots.txt than nofollow, though nothing really matters except Google,
> which respects both.

I proposed my patch for scenario if someone translate page or mirror
it without proper /robots.txt or if he will put page in different
location (subfolder) without updating his robots.txt file.

-- 
best regards
q#