Re: Link Exchange

On 22/02/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, We have visited your site http://www.openntpd.org/ and we'd like to trade
> links with you. We can offer you a VERY high quality PR3 home page. Your link
> will be hosted on an quality, actual content page
> http://www. entrepreneurs 4u .com/ rather than just a spammy link page. This page
> gets very good internet traffic and we know that Google prefers links placed
> on these types of important pages, compared to "link only" pages or
> directories. Our client would like you to link back to the URL
> http://www. offsitedigital .co.uk not the URL listed above. In the past, some of
> our link partners have expressed a preference to link back to the same URL
> that is linking to them. This is both unnecessary and less valuable than the 3
> way linking structure that we are proposing. Google can easily detect
> reciprocal linking strategies as a way of manipulating search engine rankings,
> where as using a 3 way linking structure is much less detectable, if at all.
> Please email me when you have added our link, being sure to advise the URL
> location of the link you have added. Also include details of the link you
> would like added. We'll notify after we've added your link so you can inspect
> it. Please use only the link details listed below for the outgoing link. UK
> banner stands, pop up stands, business card printing, poster printing, leaflet
> printing, postcard printing and digital printing Any problems / questions let
> me know Best Regards, Izra Links Manager

Dear Izra,

Thank you very much for your concern about the popularity of our
OpenNTPD web-site. We have added your link to one of our pages,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-www&m=117219879003367&w=2 ,
which is actually a VERY high quality web-site, not just a collection
of spammy links on a specialised domain name. We do not think that we
should add your link directly to our main page, because it is quite
likely that google by now is already aware of the three-way linking
structure that you have proposed, but we deem that the four-way
linking structure is surely still not detectable.

Take care,
Constantine,
[email protected] list subscriber.