fixes for ports doc
Tilo Stritzky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here are fixes for two small glitches in the ports doc. regards tilo Index: checklist.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/www/checklist.html,v retrieving revision 1.66 diff -u -p -r1.66 checklist.html --- checklist.html 4 Jun 2007 19:23:30 -0000 1.66 +++ checklist.html 15 Aug 2007 18:15:25 -0000 @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ id from <code>/usr/ports/infrastructure/ use and make sure your port gets added to this file at commit time. <br><br><li> -Install the application with <b>make install</b>. +Install the application with <b>make fake</b>. If the port installs dynamic libraries, check their symbol tables with <code>nm</code>, as some mistaken software strips dynamic libraries, which may lead to weird failures later. On the other hand, executable binaries Index: porting/diffs.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/www/porting/diffs.html,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.18 diffs.html --- porting/diffs.html 14 Mar 2005 11:20:15 -0000 1.18 +++ porting/diffs.html 15 Aug 2007 18:15:32 -0000 @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ We don't want ports that use <code>NO_WR ports must have a work directory. Naming details of those work directories should not be a porter's concerns. If you need to find out about such a name, ask the Makefile: <code>cd that_ports_dir -&& make show VARNAME=WRKDIR</code> will yield that port's +&& make show=WRKDIR</code> will yield that port's idea of <code>WRKDIR</code>. </p>