Re: Warning about Adaptec RAID controllers.

In gmane.os.openbsd.www, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the mentioned note should read: "... could not be stabilized,
> improved, and managed." on page http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html?

It could work either way, but neither seems entirely natural.
How about this, anyone?

Index: i386.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/www/i386.html,v
retrieving revision 1.675
diff -u -p -r1.675 i386.html
--- i386.html	31 Oct 2008 18:58:58 -0000	1.675
+++ i386.html	4 Nov 2008 11:10:14 -0000
@@ -333,9 +333,9 @@ This mode of operation is not supported 
 <li>Adaptec FSA-based RAID controllers (<a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=aac&amp;arch=i386&amp;sektion=4">aac</a>), including: <sup>(*)</sup>
     <br>
     <font color="#b00000">
-    Note: In the past year Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about forthcoming
-    documentation so that RAID support for these (rather buggy) raid controllers
-    could be stabilized, improved, and managed.<br>
+    Note: In the past years Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about forthcoming
+    documentation to allow us to stabilize, improve and manage RAID support for
+    these (rather buggy) raid controllers.<br>
     As a result, we do not recommend the Adaptec cards for use.</font>
     <ul>
     <li>Adaptec AAC-2622, AAC-364, AAC-3642, 2130S, 2200S, 2230SLP, 2410SA, 2610SA, 2810SA,