Re: Possible new mirror site in Spain
Janne Johansson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > Dear OpenBSD Team, > I'm using OpenBSD at home and at work and, finally, it seems possible to > convince definetively my boss for build a new OpenBSD mirror using our > enterprise resources (cdmon.com, the 5th hosting company in Spain). > At this point, I've some questions: > > ?It is really needed a new mirror in my country (Spain)? If the present > two mirrors are enough I think a new mirror is a no sense. Historically, there is no way to tell when mirrors will stop syncing and just fall off the face of the earth or go stale, so one more mirror wont hurt, as long as it stays updated and online. > ?What kind of mirror (http, ftp, afs or rsync) is preferible according > the OpenBSD needs? The last goal is help the proyect, so the kind og > mirror it's not important at all. ftp/http is most used for installs, rsync is for other mirrors (public or not) to re-sync from your. I do host an AFS location, but can't really tell if anyone uses it that way or not for getting the tgz's and/or packages. > ?Do you know (aprox) how bandwidth (in Mbps, of course) are needed? ?Do > you have some statistics about? It varies very much depending on how many people will choose your mirror when installing, all I can say is that my mirror goes very hot around releases and is mostly seeing google-bot indexing at other times. If you actually have bandwidth costs/issues, then perhaps it isnt a good idea to publish the mirror. I have published the OpenBSD-related log lines from my ftp/http/rsync mirror (ftp.eu.openbsd.org) so you can run whatever analyzer on it if you like. Since some other mirrors pull from me, I probably have more such traffic than an ordinary ftp/http mirror would have. http://people.su.se/~jj/obsd/ftp.eu.stats.2009.01.07.txt