Re: wm in default installation

Matteo [Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 01:27:43PM +0100] wrote:
>Hi, i've discussed with FluxBox developer, and fluxbox it's
>license compilant (MIT license) and there's no problems to
>substitute fvwm with fluxbox on OpenBSD, so if it's ok to
>substitute it, the last thing it's the work team ... i think i
>can made a work team for this but if fluxbox will not be
>integrated into default tre .. it's a waste of time .. so before
>start i would like to know if anyone care of a new OpenBSD wm
>more new and more cool.
>
>Please let me know what do you think.
>
Fluxbox is nice, but I'd love to see fvwm 2.2.5 staying in OpenBSD's
X11 as a second choice. I use it on all my machines and like this:

base upgrade/install -> x11 upgrade/install -> mount/restore home
-> X11 desktop nearly complete.

Regards,
	Bernd

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]