Re: What about other BSDs?
Winston Ford <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.opendarwin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have multiple beige G3's running opendarwin7.2.1 and darwin7.0.1.
I believe there is a way to user xpostfacto to install direct, but we
cloned the boot drive from a g4 install and used os9 boot disk to
rebuild desktop.
nice thing about using a darwin is that when developing in osx, you can
usually push to darwin with no changes, where as paths will be
different in linux and other BSD's which may require changing of config
files.
one type of osx dev that we've not figured out how to push to darwin is
java, where as I remember reading in forums about yellow dog running
blackdown. There are BSD's with java, but not on ppc.
-W
On Dec 10, 2004, at 12:16 AM, Roger Ivie wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Eric Dunbar wrote:
>> So, my question to you all is: is it worth experimenting with one of
>> the other BSD variants as a (predominately) server OS, or should I
>> stick with YDL 3.0.1 if it works for me?
>
> FWIW, I've had no luck with NetBSD 1.6.2 on my Beige G3. The bootstrap
> refuses to load ("claim failed" or somesuch; it's been a while since I
> tried). Rumor has it that an older version *will* run (at one time, I
> think I was running 1.5.mumble on the machine), but my PC, VAX, and
> Alpha are running 1.6.2, so I'd like to have it at the same rev.
> However,
> I don't have time to play with it at the moment to figure out what's
> wrong.
>
> I've currently got MacOS 9.2 and YDL 3.0.1 on it, but I'm generally
> unhappy with Linux; I have some software that depends on 64-bit file
> offsets and I just have not been able to figure out how to make it go
> on Linux (as near as I can figure, you cannot seek a raw DVD device to
> a
> 64-bit offset; whenever I try, ftello reports some whacky file position
> that is not related to where I told it to seek). 64-bit file offsets
> Just
> Work on NetBSD.
>
> I have not tried OpenBSD on a Macintosh. I've run it on a Sparc and
> thought it was OK, but stuff other than the PC support seems to be a
> bit
> behind NetBSD.
>
> FreeBSD is, of course, not an option. It doesn't even support my Alpha
> (an older TURBOchannel model), let alone a Macintosh.
>
> All this is MHO. YMMV.
> --
> Roger Ivie
> [email protected]
> http://anachronda.webhop.org/
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/P d- s:+++ a+ C++ UB--(++++) !P L- !E W++ N++ o-- K w O- M+ V+++
> PS+
> PE++ Y+ PGP t+ 5+ X-- R tv++ b++ DI+++ D+ G e++ h--- r+++ z+++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss