Re: any reasons to recompile kernel?
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:41:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.opendarwin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 22, 2005, at 1:48 AM, Maurice Ling wrote: > Why do I want to do that? Simply, I do not want extra nicey nicey > GUI stuffs that comes with Tiger. I am already satisfied with the > GUI of Panther, or Jaguar (for the sake of argument). The problem > that I have with OSX is that Apple installs many things, which are > useful, including Python and Perl. But Apple does not maintains or > upgrades them, same story with Java. So, I am using Fink to install > a copy of Python which I can upgrade. I can't do the same for Java. Ah, but it DOES upgrade them. It has substantially upgraded everything you mentioned in Tiger. Your mistake is to see Tiger as "extra nicey GUI stuffs" when, in fact, that area of the system probably comprises the least of the overall change set in TIger. Just because "Dashboard" and "Spotlight" on the marketing slides does not mean that's all that's there, it just means that marketing has a limited number of things they can highlight (and to a less sophisticated audience than people who might want to recompile their kernel). You need to look a lot deeper than that to determine whether Tiger, or any new release of MacOSX, has value for you. - Jordan