Re: spam sent to my OD address

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:27:39PM -0600, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
[snip]
> 
> Didn't that request require the potential admin to have the ability  
> to also physically deal with the machines?  I think that definitely  
> limits the potential pool of people.  If all the machines have good  
> console servers attached, then at least anything short of true  
> hardware failure could be handled remotely.  Also, being at ISC  
> (they're still at ISC, right?), are there techs available for doing  
> things like HD swaps, power cycling, and the like?
> 

	It'd be best if someone can do the hands on as well
as the non-hands on stuff.  However, since nobody is {able,willing}
to step up to do so, I don't see a problem with splitting the
task set - i.e. if we can find somebody/someplace (ISC, or ??) that
is willing to handle the physical machines, and we can find others
to handle the config/admin/etc. (all the non-physical stuff), seems
good to me.


		-eric