Re: UI design | enhancements.

i tried to solve that problem on Linux, with a wm that tiled set-sized
windows in a floating grid, but it was always very, very hacky. (For the
curious, github.com/halfwit/hwwm)

On Tue., Apr. 16, 2019, 9:59 p.m. Lucio De Re, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 4/16/19, Marshall Conover <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > As an aside, Lucio, I'd second Ethan in that it's probably worth taking a
> > look; I'd be surprised if there was more actual code to change than there
> > was just ramp-up time to understand what you need to change, and a
> > one-or-two hour excursion into the code would probably get you how much
> > ramp-up time you need, at which point you could probably make the final
> > call on whether to move forward.
> >
> Thanks to both of you for the hint. My problem, spelled out neatly
> above, is that I have no idea how one targets the correct "window" in
> X. I have completely swallowed the Plan 9 kool-aid of fine-grained
> namespace separation and can't contemplate how xnest gets it wrong.
>
> By the same token, incidentally, I've been wondering what the X
> equivalent of 9's window could be: nowhere in X's user space have I
> found a way to spawn a task in a window that matches the geometry I
> specify, unless that task includes the geometry among the command line
> arguments. That bit of philosophy shows so clearly how different Plan
> 9 and Unix really are.
>
> I will look, however. Frankly, if rio could provide a "little" more
> support, one may be able to run firefox (I'm assuming chrome/chromium
> isn't quite as liberated) in a rio window, but my efforts a while ago
> flopped completely - for which part of me is greatly relieved: somehow
> a firefox window on a Plan 9 background would be a constant thorn in
> my side.
>
> Lucio.
>
> PS: I did look at rio, not that long ago. But I think the problem
> extends to individual graphic commands. I'll see if I can get catclock
> to behave itself, next. Or shove the xnext magic into a rio option.
>
>