Re: building Alef language

hiro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.plan9.general
Message-ID <CAFSF3XOif450WHW1BcRAc0bHMVVOc6FH-Nxc-jLPHkAwe3dY4w@mail.gmail.com>
good point, but is the attention that go gets now also crippling plan9? :)

On 9/21/19, Lucio De Re <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a version for legacy Plan 9, lightly tested, that I have not
> looked at in ages.
>
> Happy to haul it out, but I see little value in it. Go may have
> idiosyncrasies, but it is much more suited to modern architectures.
> That said, had Go not surfaced, I would have much preferred Alef to
> many other options.
>
> Don't forget the rationale for dropping Alef: support for the
> language, across many architectures and including many libraries would
> have been crippling.
>
> Both of those are now Go's strong suits.
>
> Lucio.
>
> PS: A tar archive may be on sources under "proxima" - it's been a long
> time.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.