Re: building Alef language
hiro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.plan9.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFSF3XOif450WHW1BcRAc0bHMVVOc6FH-Nxc-jLPHkAwe3dY4w@mail.gmail.com> |
good point, but is the attention that go gets now also crippling plan9? :) On 9/21/19, Lucio De Re <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a version for legacy Plan 9, lightly tested, that I have not > looked at in ages. > > Happy to haul it out, but I see little value in it. Go may have > idiosyncrasies, but it is much more suited to modern architectures. > That said, had Go not surfaced, I would have much preferred Alef to > many other options. > > Don't forget the rationale for dropping Alef: support for the > language, across many architectures and including many libraries would > have been crippling. > > Both of those are now Go's strong suits. > > Lucio. > > PS: A tar archive may be on sources under "proxima" - it's been a long > time. > >