9grid advocacy, etc.
Leo Caves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.plan9.nine-grid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
First of all, I am very glad of this initiative. thanks to ron for setting it up. (speaking from the UK) There has been a huge financial commitment to "the GRID" in the UK science community (sorry, the e-Science community) [1]. To get to play, you pretty much are mandated to use the Globus toolkit / Open Grid Service Architecture (I will not attempt to navigate through the forest of acronyms). Simplicity, clarity, generality. Its been said before, and its been said on this list. You can pitch the "Dao of 9" in about 5 minutes. I do it all the time. However, I have yet to really understand the overall model in the received GRID (globus) approach. Its so fragmented, so unsatisfying. Anecdotally, its patina of utility is rather thin. It would be great to have parallel design studies for a distributed system using globus/OGSA vs plan9/inferno. Such reference material will be needed to win "political" arguments; the technical ones will win themselves. I will be trying to do my bit. Vita Nuova are partnering a PhD studentship with me to explore a "9grid" architecture in some bioscience applications [2]. It is great to have a focus for the various initiatives, in order to build the community. regards to all. Leo [1] http://www.escience-grid.org.uk/ [2] http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lsdc1/outline.htm -- Leo Caves, Computational Biology, University of York http://www.york.ac.uk/biology/staff/lsdc.htm