Re: Qt3 and QNX6.2NC Grrr....

Good dig on the SMP there Frank. ;)

Just to clarify for people...there was a mistake in the packaging of the
Dinkum C++ libs in the NC edition where libcpp.so.2a was not included in the
distribution.  You can not, however, target the Dinkum C++ lib from NC, just
run binaries built with it.  So if you are building Qt apps on 6.2 vs. libs
from 6.1 and the 6.1 libs are built against dinkum, you are in trouble.  I
am not sure what Qt is built against.

    chris

--
  Chris McKillop <[email protected]>     "The faster I go, the behinder I get."
  Software Engineer, QSSL                   -- Lewis Carroll --
  http://qnx.wox.org/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Liu" <[email protected]>
To: <openqnx-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Openqnx-developer] Qt3 and QNX6.2NC Grrr....



I don't have the PE version, and am not sure it has the same problem.
Being just a QNX hobbist, I can't justify the cost to my "boss". She
would rather use the money to feed the kids :)
On the other hand, it is probably NOT a good idea to have PE.
I certainly don't want my ported applications stop running for those
free NC users. cdm and the 3rd party CD got bitten by this already.

As far as Qt goes, my guess is PE may have a better chance than
NC because PE includes the Dinkum C++ support. Still, it probably
won't just work, because rumor said 6.2PE changed the C++ default
to GNU, while 6.1 C++ defaults to Dinkum ...

To answer johan, no I've never heard a word from Trolltech. They
are probably mad at me because my work took away their revenue from
the customer engineering work for QNX :)

Frank

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Lonnie VanZandt wrote:

> Is this a problem with just 6.2NC or with 6.2 PE, as well? (I'm not yet
> clear on what was the problem...)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openqnx-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:openqnx-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Johan CARDON
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: openqnx
> Subject: Re: [Openqnx-developer] Qt3 and QNX6.2NC Grrr....
>
>
> Le Jeudi 20 Juin 2002 17:42, vous avez écrit :
> > Most likely because of the C++ changes.
> > 6.1 uses Dinkum and 6.2NC uses GNU.
> > I will have to re-port the Qt to 6.2NC GNU C++ when I have "free" time
>
> > or "paid" time.
> >
> Yes, I understand the problem. What is the Trolltech position ? Do they
> just
> say (like me) : Thank you Mr Liu, good job !
>
> Before mail you, I tested to compile Qt3.0.4 with your recommendation
> but get
> errors at link stage so I decided to continue using your binaries port.
> But I
> will be patient and test the 6.2 qnxbasesmp.ifs under 6.1
>
> --
> Institut Albert Bonniot
> Johan CARDON Faculté de Medecine de Grenoble
> Laboratoire IMAG/TIMC/GMCAO Domaine de la Merci
> Tel: +33 (0)4 76 54 95 05 38706 La Tronche Cedex
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
>
> _______________________________________________
> openqnx-developer mailing list openqnx-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openqnx-developer
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
>
> _______________________________________________
> openqnx-developer mailing list
> openqnx-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openqnx-developer
>



-------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<