Re: Re: Test Binary Release of XFree 86 4.3

"Armin Steinhoff" <a-steinhoff-S0/[email protected]> Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:31:34 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.os.qnx.openqnx.devel
Organization http://freemail.web.de/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Chris McKillop" <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.04.03 20:28:15:
> 
> >
> > If you think we should go back to /opt/X11R6, please voice NOW.
> > I've seen too much problems and applications (emacs, x-mozilla)
> > hardcode /usr/X11R6, and some people in the newsgroups even
> > suggest doing a "ln -s /opt/X11R6 /usr/X11R6". So why don't
> > we just use /usr/X11R6 and make this change once for all.
> >
> 
> Except that /usr/bin/ph now expects that /opt/X11R6 is the location.  Also,
> the the rules for locations of packages would either have it in /opt
> (pre-compiled) or in /usr/local (locally compiled).  The /usr tree is
> supposed to be for QSS only, 

IMHO ... that's not useful because /usr/local is in most cases the standard directory prefix for most packages.

Armin


______________________________________________________________________________
UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an
UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf